Legal Opinion

Wichman v. Shabino

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2014No. 26835PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] To purchase a home, Brian Sha-bino and Sandra Wichman, formerly Sandra Shabino, borrowed money from Sandra’s mother, Mary Ann Wichman. When Brian and Sandra divorced, as part of the divorce decree, Brian had the responsibility of paying the remaining debt on the home. He failed to repay Mary Ann, and she brought suit for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and enforcement of the divorce decree. The circuit court ruled that part of Mary Ann’s breach of contract claim was barred by the statute of limitations and that she could not enforce the divorce decree. Mary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stine v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hawkins v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. City of Lincoln v. HershbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Muenster v. MuensterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Brown v. FullenweiderTexas Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DAVIDSON VS. DAVIDSONNevada Supreme Court · 2016
  2. DAVIDSON VS. DAVIDSONNevada Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Goff v. GoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Jonathan J LandisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API