Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,595 Super Stores, Inc. v. Richard L. Reiner, Paul Berkowitz
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 26, 1984No. 84-7031PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
The district court adopted as its opinion the recommendations of the magistrate. We have reviewed the magistrate’s recommendations, as adopted by the district court, and we find that they are a concise and correct disposition of the case. They are, therefore, adopted as our opinion, attached as an appendix. See also Gund v. First Florida Banks, Inc., 726 F.2d 682, 686-87 (11th Cir.1984).
AFFIRMED.
APPENDIX
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE
This action is submitted for recommendation on cross motions for summary judgment filed by the parties with respect to Count One of the complaint. All counts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kern County Land Co. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gordon v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- William S. Kaye, as Receiver for Barterline, Ltd. v. Pawnee Construction Company, Inc., Birmingham Trust National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- King v. WinklerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,488 Texas International Airlines v. National Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- David Colan, and Unocal Corporation v. Mesa Petroleum Co., David Colan, and Unocal Corporation v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re HughesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1987
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- David Colan, and Unocal Corporation v. Mesa Petroleum Co., David Colan, and Unocal Corporation v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Klein v. CENTRAL FLORIDA INVESTMENTS, INC.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009