Legal Opinion

Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1979No. 59024PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Chief Judge.

On May 3,1975 plaintiff was injured and her husband killed in an automobile collision. On November 29,1978 she brought this action against the appellee insurer to recover for lost income under no-fault provisions of her husband’s automobile policy. The defendant admits that by endorsement it would be liable for 85% of plaintiffs loss of income under the policy, but denies that the economic loss sought is compensable. The Code, § 56-3403b (b) (2), specifies a minimum no-fault coverage in automobile insurance policies to cover 85% of the loss of income or earnings during…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. CollumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Houston v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. v. SailorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. Justice v. DunbarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  5. MURRAY CHEV. CO., INC. v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Home Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Bryant v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Snow v. BayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Sentry Insurance v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API