Legal Opinion
Kiker v. Walters
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1992No. Civ. 910027Published
1Opinion of the Court
482 N.W.2d 626 (1992)
Russell L. KIKER, Jr., Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
William D. WALTERS, Sr., and Imperial Oil of North Dakota, a North Dakota corporation, Defendants and Appellants,
Lillian Y. Walters, William D. Walters, Jr., Carrie Smith, Robert T. Smith, Lillian Walters Kaiser, Marvin L. Kaiser, Leo Kaiser, Selina Kaiser, Duane C. Petersen, Defendants.
Duane C. PETERSEN, Plaintiff,
v.
Russell L. KIKER, Defendant.
Civ. No. 910027.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
March 27, 1992.
Vogel, Brantner, Kelly, Knutson, Weir & Bye, Ltd., Fargo, for plaintiff and appellee Russell L. Kiker, Jr., argued by…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TashireSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Townsend v. VanderwerkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- F. C. Gaines, Jr. v. Sunray Oil Company, Amtel, Inc. v. E. Paul Wilkinson and J. Howard Marshall, as Individuals and as the Executive AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Hospital Services, Inc. v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.