State Ex Rel. Goldstein v. District Court
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
On September 27, 1933, an action was commenced in the respondent court by KGIB, a corporation,' against Jack Gold-stein, trading and doing business as “Lubins,” and Ben Gold-stein. Ben Goldstein was never served with a copy of the summons or complaint. The return shows that purported service upon him was had by delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to “Jack Goldstein as the agent in Montana of Ben Goldstein.” The default of Ben Goldstein was entered in the action on December 4. It is conceded by all parties that there was no proper service of process on Ben Goldstein. On December 11…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Rorick v. StilwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Stubbs v. McGillisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Deming Investment Co. v. ElyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Hammond v. 8th Jud. Dist. Ct., N.M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Ellan v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1934