Ex Parte Seward
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES T. BLAIR, J .
Habeas Corpus. The only questions raised concern the validity of the act of the Extra Session of the General Assembly of 1919 (Laws 1919, p. 778) whereby it was sought to restore capital punishment in this State. The act is assailed on the grounds: (1) that the subject was not brought before the General Assembly by either method authorized by the Constitution; (2) that the bill (Senate Bill No. 2) was not “read on three different days in each house” (Sec. 26, Art. IV); (3) that the House amendments to the bill were not “printed . . . for the use of the members before final…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. MeadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Board of Supervisors of Schuyler County v. People ex rel. Rock Island & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- State v. AmbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
- State ex rel. Aull v. FieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- People v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carpenter v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- State v. O'TooleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Lauck v. ReisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- State v. ScottUtah Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.