Legal Opinion

Farr v. Kilgour

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to St. Clair; Vance, J. Replevin by Charles E. Farr against John Kilgour. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Benny purchased two horses from the plaintiff, and gave him a writing of which the following is a copy:

“Fargo, Michigan, April 13, 1894.
“On or before the 1st day of October, 1894,1 promise to pay Charles E. Farr, or order, one hundred and eighty dollars, with exchange, at Fargo, Michigan, with interest at 7 per cent, if paid at maturity. If not paid within 30 days after maturity, then I agree to pay interest at the rate of 8 per cent, from this date until paid.
*228“I have this day received from Charles E. Farr one span of mares, six years old, black, and I also add to above one black mare, three…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Marquette Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Grand Haven Military Club v. MulhollandMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API