McKenzie v. Redman

Eeplevin by an insolvent against his assignee for a double two-horse team wagon. The wagon was owned by the plaintiff when he went into insolvency. He claims it as. exempt under the statute.

There was evidence tending to prove that the plaintiff had two wagons and pointed both out to the assignee as belonging-to him. The assignee testified that he told the plaintiff he could, keep one, and requested him to make his selection, but that he-refused so to do, saying that he thought he was entitled to-both. On this point the evidence is conflicting, but the jury by their verdict have found in…