Legal Opinion · Dissent

Williams v. Zant

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 14, 2001No. S01H0493PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1DissentCarley, Justice

“[T]his Court has the duty to determine its jurisdiction over any case brought before it. [Cits.]” Sprayberry v. Dougherty County, 273 Ga. 503-504 (1) (543 SE2d 29) (2001). The Warden filed a motion to dismiss this case, and thereby formally invoked our mandatory obligation to ascertain the existence of jurisdiction. We are “bound to examine [our] jurisdiction ([cit.]). ...” Day v. Stokes, 268 Ga. 494 (491 SE2d 365) (1997). However, the majority simply ignores the motion and does not fulfill its responsibility to “address issues of appellate jurisdiction when necessary.” Warren v. Bd. of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rowland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Gibson v. TurpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. Fullwood v. SivleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  5. Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Quincy Wade v. Ralph BattleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Alderman v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API