Legal Opinion

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports

Decided January 23, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

John Vratil

State Senator, 11th District

State Capitol, Room 281-E

Topeka, Kansas 66612

Dear Senator Vratil:

You inquire whether three provisos1 included in the 2008 omnibus appropriations bill, 2008 SB 534, 2 violate the constitutional prohibition on multiple subjects in bills, Article 2, Section 16 of the Kansas Constitution. This prohibition provides, in part:

"No bill shall contain more than one subject, except appropriations bills. . . . [T]he subject of each bill shall be expressed in its title. [T]he provisions of this section shall be liberally construed to effectuate the acts of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Unified School District No. 229 v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Shrout v. RinkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Garden City Country Club v. Commercial Turf Irrigation, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API