Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 11, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Geoffrey Pugh (Claimant) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that denied him benefits. In doing so, the Board affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that Claimant, who was injured in Minnesota, had failed to prove that his employment was principally located in Pennsylvania at the time of his injury. This demonstration was a necessary prerequisite to an award of Pennsylvania workers’ compensation benefits for an out-of-state injury.

Claimant, a Pennsylvania resident, was employed as an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Steglik v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Robbins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Tennyson v. Zoning Hearing Board of West Bradford TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Williams v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. In Re Appeal of MoyerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. J. Grimm v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API