Rose v. Keystone Shoe Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to Common Pleas, No. 2, of Philadelphia County to review a judgment for plaintiff in a feigned issue to try title to personal property sold on execution. The plaintiffs in error sold goods to the firm of T. P. & S. S. Smith, who were engaged in the shoe business. They took in payment promissory notes, upon which they obtained a judgment April 26, 1884. On May 24, 1884, they levied upon certain personal property as the property of T. P. & S. S. Smith.
Read the full summary
Error to Common Pleas, No. 2, of Philadelphia County to review a judgment for plaintiff in a feigned issue to try title to personal property sold on execution. The plaintiffs in error sold goods to the firm of T. P. & S. S. Smith, who were engaged in the shoe business. They took in payment promissory notes, upon which they obtained a judgment April 26, 1884. On May 24, 1884, they levied upon certain personal property as the property of T. P. & S. S. Smith. This property was claimed by the Keystone Shoe Company, and a feigned issue framed to try the title, the Keystone Shoe Company being…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
The learned judge ruled the law correctly. If the money was loaned to the partners individually, yet if it was put into the business by them as part of their capital, it constituted ■a valid consideration to support the judgment confessed by them. The good faith of the transaction was a question of fact for the jury, and was well submitted.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Raymond Albert BureauCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Andre Scott WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Moseley v. BrankerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Burnside v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2005
- Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co. v. Board of HealthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.