Seacord v. Morgan
New York Supreme Court
The facts will appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the court—Brown, Justice.
The written undertaking upon which this action is brought was given to the plaintiff pursuant to the 335th section of the Code of Procedure. It recited that the above named Franklin B. Seacord had recovered a judgment against one Nicholas Miller and Leonard P. Miller, affirming upon appeal a judgment against them in fa*395vor of Seacord, entered upon the direction of a single judge, for $202.27 damages, with $59.27 costs of appeal, and that, feeling aggrieved thereby, they intended to appeal to the court, of appeals of the state of Mew-York. It then proceeded to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jonathan W. Nesmith v. Thomas C. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. California Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1878
- People Ex Rel. Smith v. . Village of NellistonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Murray v. JonesCity of New York Municipal Court · 1888
- Lang v. PikeOhio Supreme Court · 1875