Legal Opinion

Threatt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 21, 2006No. A06A1549PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

William Homer Threatt appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. He contends that the seven years of post-conviction delay before his motion for new trial was granted prejudiced his new trial’s defense, thus violating his constitutional due process rights. Upon review, we do not find that Threatt’s due process rights were violated, and affirm.

The record shows that a jury found Threatt guilty of shooting and injuring a woman, and on June 10, 1998, he was sentenced as a recidivist to serve 20 years for aggravated assault. His trial counsel filed a timely motion…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Boseman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Chapel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. United States v. Richard MohawkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Hargrove v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  4. Jakupovic v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API