Legal Opinion

Lacaria v. Hetzel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1953No. Appeal, 215PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

As the ground of decision in this case we quote once more the statement of the late Chief Justice Maxey in Caulton v. Eyre & Co. Inc., 330 Pa. 385, 388, 389, 199 A. 136, 138, as follows: “Backing a motor vehicle any distance unless the driver is absolutely certain there is no person in his pathway involves a risk, as countless accidents on sidewalks and elsewhere resulting from that practice attest. . . . the truck should have proceeded down the alley Avith more caution, and particularly its horn should have been sounded. The simplest, elementary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Potter Title and Trust Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Beam v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Caulton v. Eyre Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Bennett v. BoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Discovich v. Chestnut Ridge Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Roda v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. Hronis v. WissingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Edward W. Eichmann, Administrator of the Estate of Harry J. Lobnitz, Jr., Deceased v. Richard P. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  4. Smith v. Lit Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Mutter v. SlaymakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API