Legal Opinion

Segall v. Finlay

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

In February, 1923, appellants were dealers in sugar in New York and respondent was a sugar broker in Chicago. On the twenty-seventh and twenty-eighth of that month telephone conversations occurred and telegraph messages were exchanged between them in respect to a proposed sale of sugar for future delivery. The complaint alleges a contract whereby defendants agreed to sell and deliver to plaintiff four thousand (4,000) tons at five and one-eighth (5%) cents per pound cost and freight New York. The referee has found on sufficient evidence and the Appellate Division has affirmed by a divided…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Madeirense Do Brasil S/A v. Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Callan v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Soya Processing Co. v. SirotaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  5. Val Decker Packing Co. v. Armour & Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API