Legal Opinion

Estate of Bain v. Bibolini

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 1999No. 98-2589PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Because funds held in an escrow account maintained by the seller’s attorney for partial payment of a real estate commission were equitably owned by the broker to whom the commission was due,1 they were, contrary to the ruling below, not subject to garnishment by a judgment creditor of the seller. Ginsberg v. Goldstein, 404 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Hence the judgment below is reversed with directions to order the funds paid to the appellant.. See Estate of Bain v. Morales, 606 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Estate of Bain v. Gateway Group, Inc., 605 So.2d 167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); see also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. GoldsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Estate of Bain v. BiboliniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Estate of Bain v. Gateway Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Estate of Bain v. MoralesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacer Technology v. Lee Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. General R.A.C., Inc. v. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API