Legal Opinion

Guill v. Guill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Actions. Statute of limitations. Before Judge Bartlett. Greene Superior Court. September Term, 1877. Reported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Judge.

The two Guills were brothers occupying the same house'. They had a quarrel, and the one brother by his conduct constrained the other brother to leave. The brother when he left, sued the other for half the money he had expended upon the house six or seven years before, and not for dispossessing him of the joint occupancy.

The statute of limitations was pleaded in bar; the court sustained the plea, and the only question the record makes is, was the plea good ?

We think it was. The money was spent years before the suit — more than four years — and whatever account one brother had…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Engram v. EngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Renee Unlimited, Inc. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Evans v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API