Legal Opinion · Dissent
Holt v. Tullett
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1906Published
Appeal prom District Magistrate, Honolulu.
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
FRSAR, C.J.
The plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant, the captain of a steamer, for taxes. Execution was issued and returned unsatisfied. The plaintiff then instituted what are usually called proceedings supplemental to execution, by citing in the owner of the steamer, a corporation, for the purpose of having the wages due and unpaid by it to the captain applied to the judgment under R. L., Sec'. 2118. The defense of the owner is that the wages of the captain are exempt from execution and proceedings supplemental to execution as well as from ordinary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eddy v. O'HaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Ross v. BourneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1883
- McCarty v. Steam-Propeller City of New BedfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1880
- Telles v. LyndeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1891
- White v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.