Legal Opinion

Breitbart v. Weill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 21, 1938No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for recovery for professional services rendered by plaintiffs as attorneys for the defendant in claims and actions in respect to disability insurance, the defendant demanded a bill of particulars containing certain items. On motion to vacate or modify the demands the court at Special Term modified and struck out certain demands. Items 6 and 7 should have been allowed. Order modified by allowing and including items 6 and 7 in respect to which plaintiffs are required to furnish particulars, and as so modified the order, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, is affirmed,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ellis v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Sarney v. OlenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API