Legal Opinion

Scurlock v. Little

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 25, 1954No. 5-532PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

In this case, Scurlock, as Commissioner of Revenues of Arkansas, attempted to have an execution levied on the property of appellee, Little, for sales tax claimed under Act 386 of 1941. The Chancery Court enjoined the levy of the execution; aiid Scurlock brings this appeal.

Little lives and operates stores in Union County, Arkansas; and appellant is — and each of his predecessors was — Commissioner of Revenues of the State of Arkansas. In early 1952 the Commissioner notified Little that an audit disclosed that Little owed additional amounts for gross receipts (sales)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardin, Comm. of Revenues v. Gautney, ChancellorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  2. Cook, Commissioner of Revenues v. HickenbottomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scurlock v. Hardscrabble Country ClubSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Scurlock v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API