Legal Opinion
Amera-Seiki Corporation v. The Cincinnati Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 23, 2013No. 12-2739PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
In this diversity case, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1), The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati) appeals the district court’s 1 adverse summary judgment rulings in Cincinnati’s insurance coverage dispute with policyholder Amera-Seiki Corporation (Amera-Seiki). Cincinnati also appeals the district court’s award of prejudgment interest under Iowa law. Hav ing jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
1. BACKGROUND
Amera-Seiki, an Iowa corporation with its principal place of business in Iowa, imports computerized industrial equipment for customers in the United States. In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- A.Y. McDonald Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Dale Boelman and Nancy Boelman v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Weitz Co. v. MH WASHINGTONCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Phoenix Insurance v. Infogroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2015
- Avnet, Inc. v. Catalyst Resource Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015