Legal Opinion
Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Hupp
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1920No. Docket No. 45PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to Wayne; Mandell (Henry A.), J. Assumpsit by the Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company against Robert C. Hupp and Louis G. Hupp on certain promissory notes. Plaintiff later assigned its claim against Robert C. Hupp. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
This action was begun in the Wayne county circuit court on December 23, 1914, to recover from defendants a balance due on the following promissory notes:
“$5,939.83 Detroit, Mich., June 17, 1912
“Three months (3) after date we promise to pay to Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co. or order Fifty-nine Hundred Thirty-nine and 83/100 Dollars, at Old Detroit National Bank, Detroit, Mich., value received with 6 per cent, interest per annum.
“No. 876. Due Sept. 17, 1912.
“R. C. H. Corporation.
“B. Q. Hazlewood, Vice-President.
“September 17, 1912. Detroit, Michigan. Protested for npn-payment.
“W.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Park Bank v. . KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Big Rapids National Bank v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Moffatt v. CorningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SymmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Marine Trust Co. v. RodenMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968