Gil v. 75-89 Associates

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered on or about September 14, 2000, which denied the motion of defendants 75-89 Associates and Leonard Amsterdam for summary judgment, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about November 8, 2000, which, to the extent appealable, denied defendants’ motion to renew, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly held that a triable factual issue existed as to whether defendants-appellants, the owner and manager of a residential building abutting an allegedly defective and dangerous sidewalk, may be held…