Legal Opinion

Swallows v. Holden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1987No. 14636PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Judge.

Defendants-appellants, against whom the trial court entered judgment, make the unusual and valid contention that the judgment must be set aside, not for the insufficiency of the evidence to support it but for the lack of any evidence at all.

Plaintiff-respondent Elmer Swallows brought this action against defendant Dexter Palette Company, Inc., a Missouri corporation, and four individual defendants. The petition alleged, in general: On November 29, 1983, plaintiff obtained a workers’ compensation award in the amount of $15,287.62 against the corporate defendant; on January 18,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Rippe v. SutterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Taylor v. CoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Fine v. Waldman Mercantile CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Smith v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kent v. Charlie Chicken, II, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Beckmann v. Miceli Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Boillet v. ConyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Rice v. State Farm Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Landers v. HuffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API