Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. v. Grossman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 17, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

The motion to dismiss will be granted on jurisdictional grounds unless plaintiff amends complaint within twenty days of entry of order hereon, and meantime the temporary injunction will remain in force.

I. An interpleader suit involving a trustee in bankruptcy is not an interference with, and cannot mature into any charge on, the assets, for it is merely an invitation to come in and get some more assets if the trustee is entitled thereto. It does not, therefore, come within the principle of Vass v. Conron Bros. Co., 59 F.(2d) 969, 971 (C. C. A. 2), and leave to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vass v. Conron Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  2. Bush v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dakota Livestock Company and Farmers Union Marketing & Processing Association v. Gary KeimCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Lockhart v. Mercer Tube & Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  3. Eagle, Star & British Dominions v. TadlockDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
  4. Glasser v. RogersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API