Legal Opinion · Dissent

People ex rel. D.R.W.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 2004No. 03CA0559Published

1Dissent

Judge MARQUEZ

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the procedures followed in this case substantially complied with those mandated by the statutes, including § 19-3-505(7)(b), C.R.S.2003, requiring a dispositional hearing. In addition, the majority ignores the statutory requirement of § 19-3-604(3), C.R.S.2003, that in considering termination of the parent-child legal relationship, the court should give primary consideration to the physical, mental, and emotional conditions and needs of the child. See § 19-3-100.5(2), C.R.S.2003 (the health and safety of the child is the paramount…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People ex rel. A. M. D.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. C.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. People ex rel. D.L.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of C.A.K., A Child, and Concerning K.D.K.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. People ex rel. M.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API