In re the Personal Restraint of Glasmann
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentWiggins, J.
¶46 (dissenting) — I agree with the lead opinion that the prosecutor in this case improperly expressed a personal opinion about Edward Glasmann’s guilt when he superimposed the words “guilty, guilty, guilty” over Glasmann’s mug shot in a PowerPoint display. But I disagree that all of Glasmann’s convictions should be overturned as a result. While it may appear at first glance that the prosecutor’s error is grave enough to warrant a new trial on all of Glasmann’s convictions, a closer examination of the facts reveals a different story.
*717¶47 During closing arguments, Glasmann’s attorney stated,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.