Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Personal Restraint of Glasmann

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2012No. 84475-5Published

1DissentWiggins, J.

¶46 (dissenting) — I agree with the lead opinion that the prosecutor in this case improperly expressed a personal opinion about Edward Glasmann’s guilt when he superimposed the words “guilty, guilty, guilty” over Glasmann’s mug shot in a PowerPoint display. But I disagree that all of Glasmann’s convictions should be overturned as a result. While it may appear at first glance that the prosecutor’s error is grave enough to warrant a new trial on all of Glasmann’s convictions, a closer examination of the facts reveals a different story.

*717¶47 During closing arguments, Glasmann’s attorney stated,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API