Legal Opinion
West v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 18, 1923No. A-4103PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatson, P. J.
(after stating the facts as above). Summarizing the gist of this appeal, counsel for plaintiff in error at the opening of his brief says:
“While plaintiff in error has set out five separate as- • signments of error, we propose to present and argue same upon the sole proposition of law that the trial court committed a reversible error by refusing to submit defendant’s plea of former jeopardy to the jury as an issue of fact, instead of deciding same as an issue of law.”
The said plea is as follows:
“Comes now the above-named defendant, J. R. West, and for a second and further plea against the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Evans v. Willis, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Estep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Ex Parte McClureCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- State v. GoetzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allen v. District Court of Washington CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- Rambo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Kite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Caves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Hazelwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.