Tarbox v. Grant
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill for directions, &c.
1Opinion of the Court
Emery, V. C.
The bill in this case is filed for directions as to the distribution of the estate of Eliza Grant, deceased, in the hands of complainant, as her administrator, and I will state briefly the conclusions I have reached on the questions submitted.
The first question relates to the validity of a deed executed by George C. Grant, the husband of Eliza Grant, on March 5th, 1894, more than a year after her death. By this deed the husband, who was then entitled to the beneficial interest in his wife’s estate, upon which estate letters of administration had not then been taken out, conveys to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Souverbye v. ArdenNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Scrugham v. WoodNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Bunn v. WinthropNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Nelson v. NelsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
3Cited by13 opinions
- Allen-West Commission Co. v. GrumblesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Jackson v. LamarWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Payne v. PayneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Stone v. DailyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- In Re DodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.