Legal Opinion

Pure Oil Co. v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1931No. 3990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Writ of error granted. We are called upon chiefly to consider and determine the legal effect of the proceedings in the probate court in relation to the guardian's lease of the real estate of the minor, Cone Johnson Clark. If the lease was at all events unauthorized and void through lack of legality of the proceedings in the probate court, then the judgment should be affirmed; otherwise appellant's legal title seems to be sufficiently sustained and must prevail. In order to render the mineral lease upon real estate of a minor effectual to confer a valid legal right, the probate court must…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Paul Sanitarium v. CrimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Wakefield Trust Company v. WhaleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Company v. MosquedaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Clark v. Pure Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Home Indemnity Company v. MosquedaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API