Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Muskegon v. Lange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1895Published

Error to Muskegon. (Palmer, J., presiding.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts; are stated in the opinion.

1DissentGrant, J.

After the decision of Eyke v. Lange, 90 Mich. 592, the city of Muskegon instituted this, suit to recover against the defendant, who was the cashier of the bank, the amount of the tax assessed against its. stockholders who had not paid. The court directed a verdict for the defendant upon the ground that defendant, the cashier of the bank, was not liable for the taxes assessed against its stockholders.

It is the policy of the tax law to provide expeditions methods for collecting the public revenue. The method of collecting the tax is not always confined to a direct proceeding against the party…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sears v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Town of St. Albans v. National Car Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1884
  3. Eyke v. LangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Barney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  5. McVeagh v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API