Legal Opinion

State Ex Inf. Barrett v. McClure

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 14, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

The Attorney-General, April 10, 1923, filed in this court an information in the nature of quo ivarranto, alleging that one James W. Shumard, at the general election November 7, 1922, was duly elected treasurer of Harrison County, Missouri, and that respondent, Daisy McClure, usurped and continued to hold possession of said office, and praying for a writ ordering her to show by what authority she claimed the office.

A writ was duly issued by this court, ordering her to show cause, to which she made return June 1, 1923, setting up facts which appear in an agreed statement filed by the parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Crow v. HostetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. State ex inf. Barker v. KoelnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Evard v. RoachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. GeorgettaNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State ex rel. Mitchell v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Ex Rel. Penrose v. GreathouseNevada Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State Ex Rel. Hayden v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. State ex inf. Dalton v. MouserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API