Commissioner v. Atlantic City Electric Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The respondent, a taxpayer, and the Scranton Electric Company, are public service corporations. The former is organized under the laws of New Jersey and the latter under the laws of Pennsylvania. The Board considered their petitions together, and it is now stipulated that the petition of the respondent be considered and determined and that the decision of this court be accepted as controlling in the Scranton Electric Company appeal, for the questions involved are similar.
The petitioner determined deficiencies on the basis of separate returns for each taxpayer and refused…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Handy & Harman v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Adolph Hirsch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Ice Service Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- United States v. CLEVELAND, P. & ER CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shillito Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doernbecher Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Gulf Refining Co. v. FoxDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1935