Legal Opinion
Howard v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 7, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal friorn Qrady County Court; N. W. William,s, Judge. Earl Howard was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
FURMAN, PRESIDING Judge.
There is nothing in 'the record which shows that a notice of appeal in-this' case was served upon the clerk of the county court or the county attorney of G-rady county. Section 5610, Wilson’s Eev. & Ann. S't 1903, is as follows:
“An appeal is' taken by the service of a notice upon the clerk of the court where the judgment was entered, stating that the appellant appeals from the judgment. If taken by the der fendant, a similar notice must be served upon the prosecuting attorney. If taken by the territory, a similar notice must be served upon the defendant if he can be…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Ensley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Clemmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910