Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal friorn Qrady County Court; N. W. William,s, Judge. Earl Howard was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

FURMAN, PRESIDING Judge.

There is nothing in 'the record which shows that a notice of appeal in-this' case was served upon the clerk of the county court or the county attorney of G-rady county. Section 5610, Wilson’s Eev. & Ann. S't 1903, is as follows:

“An appeal is' taken by the service of a notice upon the clerk of the court where the judgment was entered, stating that the appellant appeals from the judgment. If taken by the der fendant, a similar notice must be served upon the prosecuting attorney. If taken by the territory, a similar notice must be served upon the defendant if he can be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ensley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Clemmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. State v. RichardsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API