Legal Opinion

Kinetic Co., Inc. v. BDO EOS SVETOVANJE, DOO

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 18, 2005No. 04-CV-581PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

RANDA, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, the Kinetic Co., Inc., (“Kinetic”) commenced this action against the defendant, BDO EOS Svetovanje, d.o.o., (“EOS”) a Slovenian corporation, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court. Kinetic seeks damages for unjust enrichment and a declaratory judgment that EOS cannot force Kinetic to arbitrate and that Kinetic does not owe the sums claimed by EOS. Alleging federal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because the parties are citizens of Wisconsin and a foreign state, respectively, and the amount in controversy, exclusive of costs, exceeds $75,000,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burow v. MiethnerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API