Legal Opinion

Stoltz v. Burlington Transportation Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1949No. 3982_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

Earl C. Stoltz 1 brought this action against the Burlington Transportation Company 2 to recover damages in the amount of $25,000 for the alleged wrongful death of his son, Donald Earl Stoltz, a minor, while a passenger on a bus of the Burlington Company.

The accident occurred and Donald died as a result thereof in Utah.

The Burlington Company interposed a motion in which it set up that the laws of Utah on which the action was based were incompatible with the public policy of Colorado, as set forth in Colorado Statutes Annotated, 1935, Vol. 2, Chap. 50, §§ 2 and 3.

At the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Wooden v. West. N. Y. & Penn. RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Jackson v. AnthonyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Armbruster v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  2. Richards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Burlington Transp. Co. v. StoltzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Bannowsky v. KrauserDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1969
  5. Van Buskirk v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API