Legal Opinion

Gray v. Staley

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 10, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Linwood Gray is a pro se litigant who has accused Defendants Harry, Annis, and Joann Staley of committing fraud and using the proceeds to enrich themselves at his expense. The fundamental problem with Gray’s complaint is that many of the events comprising the alleged fraud took place over 30 years ago. Not surprisingly, Defendants have moved to dismiss all of Gray’s claims as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. But Defendants’ motion to dismiss is not the only motion pending before the court.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. John C. Keegel v. Key West & Caribbean Trading Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Hinton v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Robert James Richards v. Milton Stanley Mileski (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gray v. StaleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Alston v. Mississippi Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2019
  3. Gilmer v. NoemDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  4. Gray v. StaleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Jimenez Verastegui v. NielsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API