Legal Opinion

Beagle v. Rudie Wilhelm Warehouse Company

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 15, 1970Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

*543Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant on rehearing. With him on the petition for rehearing were Richard Noble, and Pozzi, Wilson & Atchison, Portland. Walter H. Sweek, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent on rehearing. LANGTRY, J.

This case was reargued after a petition for rehearing was granted. The rehearing was granted principally because our decision did not consider the rule in Ryf v. Hoffman Construction Co., 254 Or 624, 459 P2d 991 (1969) , which held .that loss of earnings caused by the accident are a consideration…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryf v. Hoffman Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Jones v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Trent v. State Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API