Crespo v. Hernandez
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The arbitration agreement at issue violates the public policy pronounced by the Legislature in the Medical Malpractice Act, chapter 766, Florida Statutes (2012), by failing to adopt the necessary statutory provisions. Franks v. Bowers, 116 So.3d 1240, 1248 (Fla.2013) (“Because the Legislature explicitly found that the MMA was necessary to lower the costs of medical care in this State, we find that any contract that seeks to enjoy the benefits of the arbitration provisions under the statutory scheme must necessarily adopt all of its provisions.”). Therefore, we reverse the order rendered by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Franks v. BowersSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Santiago v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eileen Hernandez, M.D. v. Lualhati CrespoSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
- A.K. v. Orlando Health, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Eileen Hernandez, M.D. v. Lualhati CrespoSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
- Klemish v. VillacastinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Women's Care Florida, LLC v. A.G.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.