Legal Opinion

Ditto v. McCurdy

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 2003No. 23587Published

1Opinion of the Court

78 P.3d 331 (2003)

102 Hawai'i 518

Janie DITTO, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

John A. McCURDY, Jr., M.D., Defendant-Appellant, and

Karla Scarpiova, Defendant.

No. 23587.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

October 30, 2003.

Richard H. Grover, Honolulu, on the briefs, for defendant-appellant.

David C. Schutter and Christopher A. Dias, Honolulu, (of Schutter Dias Smith & Wong), on the briefs, for plaintiff-appellee.

MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, and DUFFY, JJ.; ACOBA, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Opinion of the Court by MOON, C.J.

This appeal arises out of plaintiff-appellee Janie Ditto's attempts to…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Best Place, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Keliipuleole v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Shimabuku v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API