Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 19, 1946No. 9003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

Upon the death of her husband, plaintiff as beneficiary of a certificate of membership constituting a contract of insurance sued defendant. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint on the grounds (1) that defendant, a New York corporation, was never qualified to do business in Indiana and therefore was not subject to the jurisdiction of the District Court there, and (2) that a one-year limitation in the contract barred plaintiff’s action. The trial court filed a memorandum opinion on defendant’s motion in which the question of jurisdiction was resolved…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Modern Woodmen of America v. MixerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Brandyce v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Karvalsky v. BeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abele v. A. L. Dougherty Overseas, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1961
  2. Muntwyler v. Ranger InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API