Legal Opinion
Aggregate Supply Co. v. Sewell
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 9, 1961No. 21420PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Justice.
The judgments under review are those denying a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a motion for a new trial based on the general grounds and one special ground.
Aggregate Supply Company brought suit against Dora Belle Sewell, Douglas W. Chandler, and other named parties who were not served and who did not appeal-, seeking an injunction, damages, and other relief. The case proceeded to trial against Dora Belle Sewell and Douglas W. Chandler as j oint defendants.
The material allegations of the plaintiff’s petition are: that he is the owner of the mineral rights…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Miller v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Tarver v. DeppenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Bosworth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Mitchell v. CrummeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barton v. GammellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- smith/burns LLC v. 905 Bernina Avenue Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Harrison v. State Highways & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Smith v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Murry v. LettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.