Legal Opinion
United States v. Pompa
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 30, 2005No. 04-40660PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises from the conviction of the three appellants, Miguel Angel Pompa, José Feliciano Pompa (collectively, “the Pompas”), and Baltazar Bazan (“Bazan”) on charges of conspiring to possess marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(B), and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Appellants challenge the denial of their motions to suppress physical evidence, certain evidentiary rulings, and the sufficiency of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Uriel Lara-VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. JohnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Todd Ion v. Chevron USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Tom Heaney v. Christopher RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. SkillingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.