Legal Opinion

Mfrs. Bldg. v. Pub. Serv.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 15, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a bill to enjoin defendant from removing gas ranges and refrigeration compressors, motors and ice boxes sold by the defendant to the Paramount Holding Company under two conditional sales agreements. They were installed by the purchaser in a building on which complainant subsequently took a mortgage which it later foreclosed.

The conditional sales agreement covering the gas ranges provided for delivery at premises in question. The defendant did not agree to, nor did it, install the ranges. The sales agreement expressly provided that "there shall be no permanent attachment to the realty,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Transit Equipment Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1898
  2. Crown v. Regna Construction Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  4. Thomas Harrington's Sons Co. v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  5. Kramer v. YocumNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawrence Associates v. Lawrence TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Julian Engineering Co. v. R. J. & C. W. Fletcher, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. SanfordUnited States District Court · 1932
  5. Gen. Motors Accept. v. F. H. Sav. L. Assoc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API