Legal Opinion

City of Rochester v. Gutberlett

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for permanent injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

It is sought "to enjoin the defendant from violating one of the penal ordinances of the city of Rochester, under the' authority of section 126 of the charter of said city, which reads as follows: “ The. City of Rochester may maintain actions in Courts of Record of. competent jurisdiction t.o restrain violations of penal and other ordinances of the Common Council.”

The right of the city to maintain the action is attacked by the defendant upon the theory that the authority thus *609conferred upon the city was beyond the power of the Legislature to grant, because it deprives defendant of his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Iler v. RossNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Ada Dairy Ass'n v. MearsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bishop v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API