Legal Opinion

Weichert v. O'Neill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this trespass action, Supreme Court properly denied that part of plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability against defendant Michael D. O’Neill. His alleged admissions in a letter dated August 21, 1995 are inconclusive on the issue of liability.

*1122The court erred, however, in failing to grant that part of plaintiffs cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (d) to dismiss defendants’ first, third, fourth, seventh, eighth, ninth and 10th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Goodrich v. . Vil. of OtegoNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Mastrofrancisco v. Mohawk Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Emigrant Bank v. MyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Herrington v. VerrilliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Loree v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Chargo v. SimonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Matter of Dixon v. County of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API