Legal Opinion

Paul v. Kuntz

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1988No. 27A02-8704-CV-00146PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIELDS, Presiding Judge.

The Pauls appeal an adverse judgment on their negligence action against Bill Kuntz. The issue on appeal is whether the judgment is contrary to law.

We reverse.

On January 29, 1985, Mark Paul, 17, and Bill Kuntz, 15, were in an automobile, owned by Mark's parents, when the automobile struck a tree. Mark and Bill were both injured.

Mark and his parents sued Bill for their respective damage, claiming Bill was the negligent driver of the automobile at the time of the collision. Bill, in addition to denying any negligent conduct on his part, raised the issues of contributory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad v. ParksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Boasiako v. Checker Taxi Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Martin v. McCarryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. Economy Leasing Co., Ltd. v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Guilford Yacht Club Ass'n v. Northeast Dredging, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Malachowski v. Bank One, Indianapolis, N.A.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Basso v. ManlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API