Legal Opinion

Haley v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 1944No. 9418Published

1Opinion

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

Our statement that “at one time Williams and his family lived in this house (at 1114 Preusser Street, Lot 4) and used the garage and driveway,” is attacked as being inaccurate. The statement is not controlling, if inaccurate, on the question of what. property Williams and wife intended -to convey as their homestead. Their homestead designation in the deed of trust securing the debt of Dr. Keyes described it as “Lots 2 and 3 only, in Block 2, P. A. Williams Addition.” This homestead designation was prior to the conveyance of the homestead to -the daughter.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wootton v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Llewellyn v. First Nat. Bank of LampasasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Schwarzer v. Calcasieu Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API