Dawes v. Selsky

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of petitioner, the determination that he violated inmate rules 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i] [possession of contraband]) and 114.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [15] [i] [smuggling]) is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Mabery v Coughlin, 168 AD2d 879, lv denied 77 NY2d 808; Matter of Shakoor v Coughlin, 165 AD2d 917, 918, appeal dismissed 77 NY2d 866). Petitioner was not denied his right to present evidence in support of his defense; he failed to show that the…